Natasha Darcy overlooked two calls from her spouse Mathew Dunbar as she investigated how to eliminate him on line, dialling a Supagas retail store to get her murder weapon a single moment later on, a jury has been explained to.
Prosecutor Brett Hatfield painted a picture of what the crown alleges Ms Darcy, 46, was performing on the afternoon of July 31, 2017, as he sent his closing handle to the jury on Thursday in the NSW Supreme Court docket.
At 12.12pm, he mentioned, somebody googled “helium fuel tamworth” on the Mac computer system in the residence where by Ms Darcy and Mr Dunbar lived at his $3.5m house, Pandora.
At 12.13pm and 12.14pm, cellphone documents display missed phone calls from Mr Dunbar to Ms Darcy.
At 12.15pm, Mr Hatfield mentioned, a connect with was produced from the dwelling landline to Supagas.
The worker who took the get in touch with experienced a “clear recollection of the ask for staying specifically for significant purity helium and it getting a feminine caller”.
Much less than 48 hrs later on Mr Dunbar was useless.
The crown alleges Ms Darcy drugged him with a sedative cocktail blended in a Nutribullet ahead of gassing him to demise with a cylinder of helium in the early hrs of August 2, 2017.
She has pleaded not responsible to murder and suggests she assisted his suicide.
In a police job interview recorded in November 2017 and performed to the jury, Ms Darcy denied buying the gas level blank.
She suggested it may have been Mr Dunbar himself, telling detectives: “Mathew had a pretty female-sounding voice.”
Challenged on this, the Supagas employee explained to the court: “No, I am 100 for every cent sure I spoke to a woman.”
Ms Darcy and Mr Dunbar alongside one another picked up the cylinder in the afternoon of August 1.
In the exact same police job interview, Ms Darcy prompt Mr Dunbar had produced the dozens and dozens of queries relating to death, suicide and murder on her telephone in between February 2017 and the time he died.
“Mat’s phone was really, really gradual,” she reported. “If he desired to google a little something … he’d use mine.”
Mr Hatfield informed the jury they need to locate normally.
On July 26, he explained, Ms Darcy’s cellular phone recorded lookups for “murder by injection”, “inject IV to death” and “what comes about if you inject hydrogen peroxide” just minutes just before a text was sent to her daughter examining “feed your horses”.
“Looking at the background intently, you would believe it is the accused and not the deceased at all on the lookout at these topics on this day,” he said.
Other queries have been recorded just prior to a video and a photograph snapped at a rugby match on various times, the jury was instructed.
Many others however appeared to arise when Ms Darcy and Mr Dunbar had been not with each other, Mr Hatfield advised the courtroom.
For instance, he said, the cell phone recorded queries linked to suicide and all over again “murder by injection” at a time when she was absent in Dorrigo, NSW.
Mr Dunbar’s DNA was on pieces of the gas equipment established up in his bed room, including a white elastic band that Ms Darcy’s DNA was also uncovered on.
Mr Hatfield advised the jury that DNA was not in the crown’s see a major portion of the case.
He pointed them towards searches Ms Darcy allegedly manufactured, this sort of as “after suicide is residence a crime scene” and “can your online historical past iphone be tracked by net provider”.
“We place to you clearly this was a individual placing her mind to concealing her tracks,” he mentioned.
“Leaving a untrue trail, masking issues up, well capable of generating guaranteed her fingerprints or her DNA is not on a person item or a different.”
The trial proceeds.